The recent geographical developments in the LNG industry are occurring at a time of consolidation. The US$53 billion combination of Royal Dutch Shell and BG Group has created the world’s largest LNG player. More recently, in July 2018, Total completed a US$1.5 billion deal to acquire Engie’s upstream LNG business to become the second largest player in the global LNG market. Further consolidation is expected as the LNG industry seeks to reduce costs and streamline operations to ensure that LNG remains attractive to the world’s major energy markets. The current consolidation, and in particular the reduced number of players operating in the LNG market, will in turn shape the future of the global LNG industry over the coming years.
The US perspective
In welcome news for the industry, after on going debate surrounding the appropriate regulatory regime for approving LNG exports and export terminals, recent actions by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and US Department of Energy (DOE) appear to signal a commitment to streamlining and expediting the regulatory process and favouring a more market-based approach. On researching, the DOE found that higher market demand for LNG exports results in higher US economic output, so for the first time did not set an upper limit for LNG exports. It also issued a policy statement, reassuring market participants that, although the DOE has the right to rescind, modify or revoke non-free trade agreement export authorisations, it “does not foresee a scenario where it would rescind” such authorisations. Running alongside this, legislation has been approved to expedite the grant of non-FTA authorisations to export natural gas up to 51.75 billion ft3 per year (for applications not requiring an environmental impact statement or assessment). FERC issued environmental schedules for 12 proposed LNG export terminals that shortened some environmental schedules currently under review by 9 to 12 months. It also hired additional LNG staff and outside contractors to assist with construction inspections and analysis.
The number of second wave US LNG export projects competing to enter into LNG sale and purchase agreements (or otherwise ensure committed offtake arrangements) is significant. Five projects, totalling approximately 58 million tpy, have FERC approvals, but have not commenced construction and 13 projects, totalling approximately 184 million tpy, have applications pending at the FERC. With consolidation occurring in the LNG industry and changing market dynamics, pressure to secure buyers remains, and it will be interesting to see how sponsors of second wave liquefaction projects seek to reduce costs and distinguish themselves in the market in order to attract buyers.
At the same time that progress is being made on streamlining permitting for LNG exports, permitting for natural gas pipelines has slowed while the FERC considers changes to its processes for certification of new interstate facilities. The FERC also revised its 2005 tax policy in 2018, to disallow the recovery of an income tax allowance in the cost of service rate of master limited partnerships.
The spectre of trade wars between the US and China (as well as other countries) has cast a shadow over US liquefaction projects. The US has imposed tariffs on the import of steel from China, which has the potential to increase costs significantly for the natural gas and LNG industry. China has set a 10% tariff on US LNG imports as a retaliatory tariff. This could dampen the enthusiasm of Chinese LNG buyers for US LNG, undermine the cost competitiveness of US natural gas and stifle the prospects for US LNG in China. In addition, Chinese investors may decide not to invest in new US liquefaction capacity, instead targeting their investments into other potential LNG export projects.
This is an abridged version of an article written by Nick Prowse and Penny Cygan-Jones, Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, UK, for the December 2018 issue of LNG Industry. To read the full version, click here.
Read the article online at: https://www.lngindustry.com/liquid-natural-gas/31122018/global-lng-outlook-for-2019/
You might also like
Pilbara Clean Fuels, Oceania Marine Energy, and RINA join forces in a collaboration to develop a low-carbon LNG production and marine bunkering concept in Port Hedland, Australia, aiming to change the maritime industry's environmental impact.