Skip to main content

Croatia's parliament gives go ahead for EU-backed LNG terminal

Published by , Editor
LNG Industry,

Reuters are reporting that Croatia passed a law on 14 June to enable the construction of a LNG terminal, part of a European Union drive to diversify away from Russian gas imports.

The terminal, which will be built on the island of Krk in the northern Adriatic Sea, will be partly funded by the EU but has been criticised by environmental groups and local councils.

Environmentalists said ahead of the vote that they would stage fresh protests and may ask the Constitutional Court to rule if the law is in line with the constitution.

The project will be built in two stages, involving a floating terminal followed by an onshore facility.

The head of the company behind the project, LNG Hrvatska, recently said the cost of the floating terminal had been cut by €90 million (US$105 million) to €250 million and its capacity scaled down to ensure its profitability.

The EU has said it would provide €101.4 million, while the remainder will be financed from equity and loans.

The law, which the government said was designed to help untangle property issues and other factors, was supported by 77 lawmakers in the 151 seat-parliament.

The terminal would supply gas to countries in eastern and central Europe, regions heavily dependent on Russian gas.

Before the vote, opposition lawmakers called on parliament to reject it on environmental grounds and some also questioned its profitability and said it may endanger tourism, the main engine of Croatia’s economic growth.

The energy and environment ministry has said the terminal would not pose a significant threat to the environment or tourism.

LNG Croatia is currently running a tender for delivery of a floating storage and regasification unit (FSRU) for the terminal. An FSRU is a special type of ship whereby LNG brought in by tanker is converted back to gas to feed into the grid. The tender expires on 15 June.

The company is also preparing a second round of bidding for use of the terminal’s planned capacity of 2.6 billion m3 of gas a year.

The first round of bidding for the capacity of the terminal drew little interest.

US government officials have said that US energy companies are keen to be major suppliers for the terminal, but no decision has been taken.

Read the article online at:

You might also like


Embed article link: (copy the HTML code below):


LNG Industry is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.