A new report by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) highlights stark, growing risks for Australian LNG producers as a result of large numbers of cancelled or stalled LNG import and power projects in emerging Asian markets.

Industry forecasts have generally indicated that Australia’s LNG sector will increasingly be exposed to uncertain demand in price-sensitive emerging markets in Asia. With demand from its traditional LNG customers in Japan and South Korea falling, and demand growth projections in China being revised downwards, South and Southeast Asia are widely projected to become the key growth markets for LNG.

However, according to IEEFA’s latest research, more than half of proposed LNG-fired power projects and import terminals across the Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand, and Bangladesh were cancelled or showed no notable progress between 2021 – 2026. IEEFA’s report, LNG-to-power in emerging Asia: A five-year review of project outcomes, was written by Sam Reynolds, IEEFA Asia’s LNG/Gas Research Lead, and Christopher Doleman, IEEFA Asia’s LNG/Gas Specialist.

Commenting on their findings, Joshua Runciman, Lead Analyst, Australian Gas at IEEFA, notes that they highlight risks for the LNG sector in Australia.

“Lower-than-anticipated demand growth, at a time when global LNG supply is booming, is likely to push down LNG spot prices,” said Runciman. “This will reduce Australia’s export earnings and undermine the financial case for new gas projects in Australia, which already face the disadvantage of high production costs.

“LNG exporter, Woodside, is particularly exposed, with its expensive Browse project set to be uncompetitive in a low-price environment. There are also broader macroeconomic risks, with falling LNG export revenue contributing to lower Australian tax revenue and a worsening in Australia’s terms of trade.”

The report identified 49 proposed LNG-fired power plants and 22 regasification terminals that have been cancelled or shown no notable progress between 2021 – 2026, with an estimated total value of US$67.8 billion. This is nearly 4.5 times the value of projects completed during the same period.

“Recent developments in fuel, equipment, and currency markets have exacerbated execution risks for LNG-to-power projects in emerging Asian economies while weakening the revenue certainty needed to secure project financing,” added Reynolds. “As a result, the region’s LNG expansion has progressed far more slowly than the global gas industry expected.”

Despite a substantial pipeline of proposed LNG power plants and import terminals, only 11% of proposed power generation capacity and 15% of import terminal capacity in the four markets came online between 2021 – 2026. This is a substantially lower completion rate than IEEFA estimated in a 2021 analysis of the commercial feasibility of LNG-to-power projects in the region.

Moreover, completed power projects took more than seven years on average to reach commercial operations, far longer than the 3 – 4 year estimates often claimed by project developers.

Since 2021, extreme LNG price volatility, higher capital costs, longer lead times for gas turbines, and the depreciation of emerging Asian currencies against the US dollar have weakened the financial viability and bankability of LNG-to-power projects.

“Taken together, these risks could increase the total levelized cost of electricity from LNG-fired power plants by up to 130% compared to baseline assumptions in 2021,” according to Doleman. “Across emerging Asia, energy-sector development plans that rely heavily on LNG were often formulated on assumptions of lower fuel prices and affordable capital costs. Those assumptions no longer hold.”

Global LNG prices have remained well above pre-2020 averages following Russia’s full scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the outbreak of the Middle East conflict in 2026. In September 2026, Asian spot market prices reached US$27.5/million Btu, nearly three times pre-conflict levels.

Along with fuel price volatility, a global shortage of gas turbines is widely expected to increase capital costs for new LNG-fired power plants and delay the construction of numerous projects in emerging Asia. Capital costs for recent gas projects in the US, for example, have increased nearly fourfold since 2022. Delivery timelines for heavy-duty turbines now extend to six years or more.

Meanwhile, falling costs and faster rollout timelines for renewable technologies such as solar and wind are reducing the need for LNG-fired baseload power. Growing battery storage capacity could further limit the need for LNG-fired peaking generation. Together, these trends increase the risk of underutilisation for the region’s gas infrastructure.

The report also examines the financing and development challenges facing LNG-to-power projects in each of the four markets surveyed.

In the Philippines, numerous LNG projects have been cancelled since 2021, largely due to difficulties securing bankable offtake agreements with distribution utilities. The growth of renewable energy projects has also complicated dispatch dynamics for fossil fuel assets, while the lack of demand in non-power sectors hinders the commercial viability of new LNG import terminals.

Despite Vietnam’s ambitious LNG-to-power targets, only one LNG-fired power project has reached commercial operation in the last five years. Persistent challenges concerning the bankability of power contracts have created significant barriers to investment, while LNG cost escalation amid uncertain tariff recovery threatens the state-owned utility’s financial health.

Thailand recorded more progress in completing gas-fired projects but continues to face significant underutilisation of existing gas plants and LNG terminals.

Bangladesh has completed three LNG-fired power plants since 2021, but high LNG and power costs have increased government subsidy burdens and deepened reliance on external financing to preserve foreign-exchange reserves. Despite these expenditures, the country continues to face gas shortages due to unreliable LNG supplies.

“In each market, the investment case for new projects is becoming more difficult due to higher US dollar-denominated fuel and capital costs, alongside increasing competition from renewable technologies,” commented Doleman.

“National market conditions differ, but the underlying financial and operational risks for LNG-to-power projects are similar throughout the region,” concluded Reynolds. “Ultimately, the poor track record for LNG-to-power projects since 2021 suggests that expectations for rapid LNG demand growth in emerging Asia may be disconnected from on-the-ground project outcomes.”